Paul McCartney slams The Rolling Stones, calls them a ‘blues cover band’

12October 2021

Someone get Paul McCartney an umbrella because he’s throwing a lot of shade.

In an interview with The New Yorker, the Beatles member called rival British rock band The Rolling Stones a “blues cover band.”

Ouch.

WHAM! BASSIST DEON ESTUS DEAD AT 65

Sir Paul McCartney "Hey Grandude!" book signing at Waterstones Piccadilly on September 06, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by Mike Marsland/WireImage)

Sir Paul McCartney “Hey Grandude!” book signing at Waterstones Piccadilly on September 06, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by Mike Marsland/WireImage)
((Photo by Mike Marsland/WireImage)         )

“I’m not sure I should say it, but they’re a blues cover band, that’s sort of what the Stones are,” McCartney, 79, said. “I think our net was cast a bit wider than theirs.”

It’s not the first time he took a dig at the band, either. In April 2020, McCartney claimed during a talk with Howard Stern that he thought the Beatles were better than the Stones.

“They are rooted in the blues. When they are writing stuff, it has to do with the blues,” McCartney said at the time. “We had a little more influences … There’s a lot of differences and I love the Stones, but I’m with you. The Beatles were better.”

The Stones frontman Mick Jagger responded to the comments on Zane Lowe’s Apple Music show weeks later. Jagger, 78, called McCartney a “sweetheart” and said that “there’s obviously no competition” between the two music groups.

Mick Jagger, center, performs with his Rolling Stones bandmates, from left, Ron Wood, Charlie Watts and Keith Richards during their concert at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California on Aug. 22, 2019  (Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP, File)

Mick Jagger, center, performs with his Rolling Stones bandmates, from left, Ron Wood, Charlie Watts and Keith Richards during their concert at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California on Aug. 22, 2019  (Photo by Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP, File)

“The big difference, though, is, and sort of slightly seriously, is that the Rolling Stones is a big concert band in other decades and other areas when the Beatles never even did an arena tour, or Madison Square Garden with a decent sound system,” Jagger explained. “They broke up before that business started, the touring business for real.”

RAPPER TYGA ARRESTED FOR FELONY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AFTER ALLEGED ALTERCATION AT HOLLYWOOD HILLS HOME

“They broke up before the touring business started for real…They [The Beatles] did that [Shea] stadium gig [in 1965]. But the Stones went on,” he said. “We started stadium gigs in the 1970s and are still doing them now.”

And indeed the Stones still are still touring, even without longtime drummer Charlie Watts, who died in August.

“That’s the real big difference between these two bands,” Jagger added. “One band is unbelievably luckily, still playing in stadiums and then the other band doesn’t exist.”

McCartney recently alleged that late bandmate John Lennon is one who broke up the Beatles. “I didn’t instigate the split. That was our Johnny,” McCartney told BBC Radio 4 in an interview set to air Oct. 24.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I am not the person who instigated the split. Oh no, no, no,” he said. “John walked into a room one day and said, ‘I am leaving the Beatles.’ Is that instigating the split, or not?”

This post was originally published on this site

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

See Your Business Here!

For more information on our listings, advertising, coupons, and mailers, please contact us today!